<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Unusual Christmas Gifts: Exciting Gifts for Your Dear Ones</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.universefree.com/archives/2018.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.universefree.com/archives/2018.html</link>
	<description>To carry forward the spirit of Free</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 03 Jul 2010 11:47:04 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Rory Fett</title>
		<link>http://www.universefree.com/archives/2018.html/comment-page-1#comment-323</link>
		<dc:creator>Rory Fett</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Feb 2010 17:29:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.universefree.com/archives/2018.html#comment-323</guid>
		<description>Definitely agree with what you stated. Your explanation was certainly the easiest to understand. I tell you, I usually get irked when folks discuss issues that they plainly do not know about. You managed to hit the nail right on the head and explained out everything without complication. Maybe, people can take a signal. Will likely be back to get more. Thanks</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Definitely agree with what you stated. Your explanation was certainly the easiest to understand. I tell you, I usually get irked when folks discuss issues that they plainly do not know about. You managed to hit the nail right on the head and explained out everything without complication. Maybe, people can take a signal. Will likely be back to get more. Thanks</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dominick Prophit</title>
		<link>http://www.universefree.com/archives/2018.html/comment-page-1#comment-32</link>
		<dc:creator>Dominick Prophit</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Dec 2009 12:26:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.universefree.com/archives/2018.html#comment-32</guid>
		<description>Bought this because it was the best looking, even when turned off. It has no visible speakers, chins, &quot;touch of blood color&quot;, see-thru windows, power lights,  barnacles, gold trim, fur, or any of that sillyness. Though I was initially disappointed to see it had a grinning &quot;light effect&quot; at the bottom, but luckily that was easy to turn off. The tv looks beautiful and minimalist even before you turn it on, so this is one that will continue to look good for a long time. Having looked at many, my opinion is that this is the best looking TV you can buy right now. 

Once you turn it on the picture quality is quite good. In our case it replaced a Sony s2000 40-inch, and the picture quality is as good and better in some areas. Viewing angle is not quite as good as the Sony, though not bad. Blacks are noticeably blacker than the Sony, or any other LCD I&#039;ve seen for that matter. In a room with lights on, the blacks look as dark as the black border around the TV. In a room with no lights on, the blacks are slightly lighter (depending on your settings). I was glad to see a near complete absence of any clouding or flashlighting. On a pure white background screen, there is some slight vignetting in one corner, though not visible in normal use.  

One thing that does differentiate it is the 240hz blur and judder reduction. This is great for tickers on news channels, and for sports, but makes everything else look like BBC kids shows, which is to say kind of bizarre and hard to watch. We won&#039;t be using this feature except when we want people to leave. Though it is acceptable with blur reduction sans judder reduction. But if motion blur is a big issue for you then you should probably be looking at a different HDTV technology rather than put up with these strange looking solutions. In my case, I&#039;m so used to the inherent LCD motion blur that I my eyes are used to it, even preferring it. We are very happy with the tv and would purchase again, though think the price is still a bit high, even with the discount. But compliments to samsung for a good looking, performing and quality product. 

Lastly I wanted to mention that amazon&#039;s shipping with Pilot was excellent. Box arrived in perfect condition and by people that care and take their job seriously.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bought this because it was the best looking, even when turned off. It has no visible speakers, chins, &#8220;touch of blood color&#8221;, see-thru windows, power lights,  barnacles, gold trim, fur, or any of that sillyness. Though I was initially disappointed to see it had a grinning &#8220;light effect&#8221; at the bottom, but luckily that was easy to turn off. The tv looks beautiful and minimalist even before you turn it on, so this is one that will continue to look good for a long time. Having looked at many, my opinion is that this is the best looking TV you can buy right now. </p>
<p>Once you turn it on the picture quality is quite good. In our case it replaced a Sony s2000 40-inch, and the picture quality is as good and better in some areas. Viewing angle is not quite as good as the Sony, though not bad. Blacks are noticeably blacker than the Sony, or any other LCD I&#8217;ve seen for that matter. In a room with lights on, the blacks look as dark as the black border around the TV. In a room with no lights on, the blacks are slightly lighter (depending on your settings). I was glad to see a near complete absence of any clouding or flashlighting. On a pure white background screen, there is some slight vignetting in one corner, though not visible in normal use.  </p>
<p>One thing that does differentiate it is the 240hz blur and judder reduction. This is great for tickers on news channels, and for sports, but makes everything else look like BBC kids shows, which is to say kind of bizarre and hard to watch. We won&#8217;t be using this feature except when we want people to leave. Though it is acceptable with blur reduction sans judder reduction. But if motion blur is a big issue for you then you should probably be looking at a different HDTV technology rather than put up with these strange looking solutions. In my case, I&#8217;m so used to the inherent LCD motion blur that I my eyes are used to it, even preferring it. We are very happy with the tv and would purchase again, though think the price is still a bit high, even with the discount. But compliments to samsung for a good looking, performing and quality product. </p>
<p>Lastly I wanted to mention that amazon&#8217;s shipping with Pilot was excellent. Box arrived in perfect condition and by people that care and take their job seriously.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Otts</title>
		<link>http://www.universefree.com/archives/2018.html/comment-page-1#comment-14</link>
		<dc:creator>Otts</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Dec 2009 03:14:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.universefree.com/archives/2018.html#comment-14</guid>
		<description>The Samsung 50 Inch HDMI  is one of the hottest gifts this Christmas, they&#039;re selling out fast. I found mine at http://astore.amazon.com/50-inch-lg-hdtv-for-sale-20</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Samsung 50 Inch HDMI  is one of the hottest gifts this Christmas, they&#8217;re selling out fast. I found mine at <a href="http://astore.amazon.com/50-inch-lg-hdtv-for-sale-20" rel="nofollow">http://astore.amazon.com/50-inch-lg-hdtv-for-sale-20</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
